GoldBlog – Blog GoldChess.com

United States Championship Tournament – Saint Louis 2026

Round 6
Awonder Liang – Aronian 1-0
Misfortunes never come singly. A second consecutive loss—this likely puts an end to any hopes of a top finish in this tournament. We will show how Aronian should have played to win this game. Overall, there were no major upsets, though the competition remains fierce; the top four—Woodward, So, Caruana, and Liang—all have 4 points. In Aronian’s game, the position reached a point of resignation; naturally, one cannot win an endgame down a bishop. However, a few moves earlier—while he still had a knight—Aronian could have secured a draw. In total, across three variations of this game, we see 3 draws and 2 wins. We will present the 3 draws.

Round 6 – Women’s Section
Things are more interesting here. The leader, Alice Lee, suffered a defeat against Rachael Li. Only the second-placed player, Landeiro, remains undefeated.
Lee–Li 0-1. The final position is a rout—I wouldn’t have expected Lee to lose in such a fashion. White is left with only a rook, while Black has a rook and four pawns. 35.h4 was far too bold. We explored a different line, resulting in a draw that is quite pleasing—everything played with clockwork precision. We featured Aronian in the previous round; today, we will showcase this draw.

Round 5
A round of upsets. We predicted that Aronian would lose in the fifth round—we just didn’t know to whom. We certainly didn’t foresee that both Caruana and Niemann would also lose their games. Let us come to the rescue.
Aronian vs. Xiong: 0–1. Losing with the white pieces is always a bitter defeat. As it turns out, Xiong is a dangerous opponent; he previously defeated Liang when the latter was the tournament leader. He appears to be the “dark horse” of this event. After all, everyone has gaps in their chess education—no one can perfectly master every opening or memorize the 10 million games found in the ChessBase database. Everyone possesses a specific slice of chess knowledge, combined with their own natural talent, and they make the best of it. But back to the game: once Aronian embarked on a flawed plan (move 21. Nf5), things went downhill. He simply needed to recognize that the d6-pawn was the most critical asset for White and defend it—much like we would have done. We present one of the winning lines following 21. f3.

Woodward–Caruana 1–0
Depending on how the computer plays, the outcome is either a draw or a win. Caruana would likely have handled this with ease—provided, of course, that he had followed our line.

Robson–Niemann 1–0
A misunderstanding. There was no need to resign the game; the position was, in fact, a draw. We also don’t believe that Robson would have managed to play better and secure a win from that point.

Women’s Championship, Round 5
Nothing particularly extraordinary occurred. Lee won, strengthening her position as the leader, while Paragua also secured a victory, moving up to third place. Only three players remain undefeated: Lee, Landeiro (currently in second place), and Anna Zatonskih. Which of them will suffer a defeat in the sixth round?

Round 4
The upset of the round: Xiong, ranked 10th, defeated the leader, Liang, causing him to drop to third place. Caruana took the lead after winning his game against Robson, while So moved into second place following a draw with Aronian.
So, the result was Xiong 1–0 Liang, and this is the game we will focus on. The move 68.Kc5 was a brilliant game-ender; after Black captures the bishop with their knight, they are unable to prevent the a6-pawn from promoting to a queen. However, Liang could have secured a draw; our analysis confirms this in every possible variation. See.

Round 4, Women’s Section
The leader, Paragua, lost to Lee and dropped to third place, with Alice taking over the top spot—a dethroning. We won’t be analyzing that game, though; we are show draws in the game Liang lost.

Round 3
A drawn clash at the top: Liang vs. So. We examine whether either of them could have won and who held the better chances. We would have bet on Liang; the position is reminiscent of 19th-century games, and White possesses significant attacking potential. And indeed, there was a win available. We demonstrate a clever way to eliminate the white bishop—a move that decides the game’s outcome. Of course, it is impossible to know for certain if So would have opted for the easy pickings of two pawns, but in chess, nothing is guaranteed until the very end. This game will be featured in our tournament coverage, allowing everyone to see for themselves…

Women’s Round 3
Atwell vs. Landeiro: Draw
There was some shuffling of the standings in Round 3. Alice Lee held her spot in the top three by defeating Yu and moving up to second place. Following two draws, Paraqua climbed to first place, while Landeiro dropped to third. All three players have 2.5 points. We take a closer look at Landeiro’s draw, which cost her the lead. Could she have won against Atwell while playing Black? She could have—and in brilliant fashion, too.
Both players demonstrated incredible fighting spirit and a desire to win. They only agreed to a draw on the 74th move, although a draw was effectively already on the cards by move 31, following the exchange of queens. Overall, it was a double-edged game where both sides had winning chances; however, we focused specifically on Black’s opportunities. And we found a clear-cut win.

Round 2
In the second round, we have a game featuring Xiong, who was in the top three but has now lost to So. Xiong could have won this game; he just needed to play it properly. We applied our video analysis techniques and overanalysed White’s moves. We’ll show the game here after the tournament, when it will feature as a study.

Round 2, Women
Li, who had previously defeated Irina Krush, lost her game to Landeiro (the current leader).
Could Li have won or drawn? Let’s take a look. Checkmate on move 52, preceded by the loss of her queen.
Li was checkmated like a novice. In this game, we’ve had fun creating the moves. Winning it puts you in a good mood for the whole week. See how we did it.

Round 1
There were only three wins in the first round. Surprisingly, the players who lost their games were those who could have been in contention for the title: Shankland, Niemann and Sevian. And, interestingly, they all lost whilst playing black. However, the tournament isn’t over yet; we’ll see what happens next. We’re going to analyse these three games. And here’s a point to note: we’ve observed that nobody else in the world is doing this. Either other analysts are lazy, or ours are the best in the world. And I wouldn’t argue with that at all.
So-Sam Shankland 1–0. So didn’t win until move 80. Well, the pawn advantage wins the day here. The reason for the loss – a mistake on move 56. And here, too, a draw was within Black’s reach. And there we have it. He’s through to the next round.

Xiong–Sevian 1–0. The illusion of chess. And this isn’t at all about Xiong being a magician who cast a spell on Sevian. The win itself is the illusion. We’ve got a draw. And believe me, there couldn’t be a simpler draw in chess. Sevian simply didn’t ‘have his day’ in this game.

Liang–Niemann 1–0. Niemann was literally cornered and, to use boxing terminology, knocked out. None of the black pieces can escape. It’s worth noting here that Liang recently beat Nakamura 6–3 in a match. So he knows his chess. Will we manage to pull Hans out of the volcanic crater before it erupts? Probably yes. And if so, we’ll have not just a draw, but a win. We’ll show you the move now.
Only at our Chess Academy will you learn to play like this. Come and join us.
https://learnchess.pl

Women
Round 1
Li-Krush 1–0
The most recognisable American female chess player lost to Li in Round 1. It was surprising, as she had formidable counter-attacking opportunities. White had only an active queen, whilst Black had a phalanx of pawns in the centre. But instead of capitalising on this, Irina made a completely hopeless 21st move, Ne5. That’s not how we teach chess at our Academy. We played in our own style, following our own concept, and secured the win, whilst at the same time producing one of the most beautiful games in Goldchess history – checkmate on move 37. In this game, White resigns on move 34, but we show how the game would have unfolded had they not resigned. A queen sacrifice leading to an inevitable checkmate. That’s how Krush could have played it.
Take a look at our little gem.

Games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

Sinquefield Cup Tournament
Analysis of selected games.
Round I
Caruana v Foreest 1–0
In the first round, there were draws and just one loss – Foreest’s defeat by Caruana on move 55. Playing our way, we would have won one move earlier. This game of ours will feature in our Grandmaster Corner competition: win in 54 moves. We’ll show it here after the competition.
Round 2
Sinquefield Cup Tournament
Aronian v Keymer 1–0
The highly-ranked Keymer (8) lost to Aronian (19). Well, Aronian is not to be underestimated. He knows how to play chess too. Let’s take a look. The endgame. White has two extra pawns; there is no possibility of another check; the d7-square must be defended against mate, but there is no defence. After 91… Qc6, the sequence 92.Qf7+ Kd8, 93.Qd7+ Q:d7, 94. ed7 K:d7, 95.f5 follows, and Black is unable to prevent the queen’s promotion. So let’s look for a point earlier where Keymer lost his way.
We can see it now. The problem lies in the ill-considered rook move, 58…Rd4, after which the rook was left unprotected and White emerged from the situation with an extra pawn. A moment’s inattention and that was the end of it. Capturing it, after White had sacrificed their rook, gave White a winning position. Keymer fought on for a long time, but unfortunately, the extra pawn proved decisive. Keymer had a draw in the bag; all he needed to do was repeat check with his queen instead of moving the rook. That’s an old piece of chess wisdom. If you have a draw, don’t play for a win, or you’ll lose. Keymer forgot that.
Besides, in this round, So took his revenge on Foreest for his defeat in the Saint Louis Rapid.

Round 3
Caruana–So 0–1
The most important game of Round 3. Caruana lost to So, putting So in the lead. We have a draw and a win. These are extraordinary games, which is why we won’t be showing them; both will feature in our Top tournament. To win or draw such a game, you need to know a thing or two about chess, and that’s what we want to teach you.
Round 4
Draws all round, with only Praggna beating Foreest – a result we do not dispute. At the top of the table, So drew with Aronian, and Caruana drew with Sevian. Both were playing Black. We do not dispute these draws, but just to be sure, we’ll check whether either of them could have won – So or Caruana.
Sevian–Caruana, a draw on move 61.
The game was already a draw on move 46; Sevian kept playing because he thought he could win with a rook against a bishop. It turns out, however, that a bishop defending pawns and defended by pawns is unbeatable.
So if anyone could have won this game, it was only Caruana. However, the capture 39…f:g4 was a mistake. We played differently and have a win on move 58. Let’s take a look.
Aronian–So
Here, So, who was in a difficult position, ‘trapped’ Aronian into a draw. We have two draws in different variations. And in both, if CEEC makes a mistake, we win. So a draw, with the advantage to Aronian, who could have won if So had made a mistake. We’ll show one of the draws. The c6 bishop prevented us from carrying out a beautiful combination ending in mate

Round 5
Keymer beat Giri, and Caruana beat Aronian, who consequently dropped to 6th place. This is Aronian’s first defeat. Let’s take a look. The endgame was dramatic. Black was down a piece, and what’s more, their two minor pieces were under attack. A masterfully played game by Caruana.
But the most important game of this round was the draw between So and Praggna. Could the leader have won it and pulled a full point clear of his rivals? That is the question. And here is the answer. Contrary to appearances, Black’s 19… Ge4 was a weak move. So responded with an even weaker move, allowing his own pawns to double. We capitalise on Praggna’s weak move and make a different one. The iron logic of chess follows, with a few brilliant moves by White resulting in the capture of a piece. And then, when White decides to sacrifice a piece, it is also a masterclass in play. And after this combination, one can say: it’s all over. Thanks to the Goldchess style and techniques, we naturally have a quicker win, but we’re showing this one because of its captivating beauty. This is how So could have played.
Round 6
None of the leading players lost. We’re taking a closer look at Lagrave’s draw with So, who retained the lead despite the draw. We have a win. We’re demonstrating the technique by which So could have won this game. The basis of our combination is the capture of a white pawn (50…e:f5).
It’s quite astonishing that So, ranked 2773, played at a 1000 Elo level – or perhaps even at an amateur level – by doubling his pawns on the ‘c’ file himself, and then allowing the move 62.f6. It seems that So has some gaps in his training, as in the game of the previous round he also allowed his pawns to be doubled up, thereby depriving himself of any chance of winning in both games. Setting aside So’s rating, his chess instinct alone should have told him that he must not allow f6, as White would then gain a free pawn. Our victory is a real chess feast. Take a look.

Round 7
Only one game ended in a result: Keymer lost with the white pieces against Sindarov. The rest were draws.
Wesely So retained the lead by drawing with Giri. Another missed chance to win?
Let’s take a look at both games. So. So made a fundamental mistake – a textbook blunder, you might say – by exchanging rooks on move 27. Being left with opposite-coloured bishops bodes for nothing but a draw. A lack of fighting spirit on So’s part? It’s hard to say. So yes, a third missed opportunity to win. In our view, a 100 per cent certainty. We have a draw and two wins when, in the CEEC position, he makes two different moves.
Keymer. To lose with White? The old chess rule applies: win with White, draw with Black. We’ve also been repeating at Goldchess for years: to win, you have to play. Keymer didn’t play.
And we simply cannot understand why he played 49.Ke2, giving up the e4 pawn. 49.Bg6 also loses, whilst the very obvious 49.Bf3 wins. 49.Ke2 (?). If there were a role at tournaments for someone to set up the pieces on the board for the masters, I suppose that person would not have played 50.Ke2.

Round 8
A precarious situation. So’s sixth draw in a row – he’s practically asking to lose. What’s more, Praggna has drawn level with him on points after beating Lagrave, and his lead is now in jeopardy. Round 9 will decide everything. In this round, Caruana also lost to Keymer and is now in 6th place, whilst Keymer, despite two defeats, has moved up to third.
Lagrave–Praggna 0–1. Gaining a pawn at the cost of the game. An interesting alternative. White are attacking, but not really attacking. It is only we who show what an attack should look like in this game. And although this is a ‘Tal-style’ attack – risky, but with the hope that Black will take the a2 pawn – it’s worth demonstrating. Keymer could have played it, because, knowing Praggna and his penchant for taking pawns, he could have assumed that Praggna would take that pawn. It’s mate in 35 moves. But we also have a more stable winning line, a variation which Praggna would certainly not have been able to handle. We’ll show both games here at a later date; first, we’ll give our players a chance to find these solutions in the Top or Immortal tournaments.
Sevian–So draw. The leader’s position hangs by a thread. We’ll show two variations of how Sevian could have won.
In our analytical assessments of positions, we are rarely wrong – if ever.

Round 9
A draw-filled round. So held on to his lead and is the winner. A score of 5.5 points out of 10 – 2 wins and 7 draws – is nothing to write home about. Besides, he also made a lot of mistakes and failed to ‘press home his advantage’ in many games. Although he did leave many excellent players – some even better than himself – in his wake, the quality of his play leaves much to be desired. For the sake of it, let’s analyse his latest draw. And as before, he could have won. We have a few winning moves, the best of which we’ll show here.
Summary.
We use simple and effective game plans. The greats don’t see them. Learn to play like this.
Tournaments: https://goldchess.com. Chess courses: https://learnchess.pl

The games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

We’re making history (1)
Praggna won. We’re highlighting the players who finished the tournament with just one loss.
Wesely So (third), Aronian (sixth), Caruana (ninth). Caruana’s low placing is something of a surprise, but then, you don’t always have a good day or be in top form. Only So suffered a slip-up against Forrest; Caruana and Aronian lost to the winner.
Caruana–Praggna 0–1. Pragg is a master at winning pawns. But this isn’t great chess. Caruana played 31.Re2, a mundane move, defending the b3 pawn. We see it differently. Black will take the b3 pawn and that will be the end of their campaign. He shouldn’t have exchanged queens, but should have gone on the attack instead. Caruana didn’t do that and lost. And the position was fantastic for an attack. See how we did it. We demonstrate a checkmate involving the sacrifice of the queen.

If you like our style and our criteria for evaluating positions, we invite you to join our educational programme.
1. Tournaments vs. educational software. You’ll learn to play modern and effective chess. (https://goldchess.com). Learn and join the best.
2. Goldchess Chess Academy. Courses for everyone, for all levels, in 5 languages. The power of Polish know-how: https://learnchess.pl. We look forward to welcoming you.
*Anyone who organises a group of 9 students will receive a free course or a $300 bonus as the tenth member.
We are also looking for coaches to cooperate with us and run our course.

Chess at a Crossroads. At Odds with Ethics (2)
So-Foreest 0–1
When a top-class chess player loses with the white pieces, something is amiss. The endgame. Both sides have two pieces each, but White has one more pawn. And they must win. If the opponent carries on playing and, on top of that, wins, it’s a complete sham. Yet this is what happens, because chess has become trivialised. Players are playing for the result, and real, genuine chess is secondary here. In the position we’ve chosen, Black should resign. But Foreest carried on playing and won. What a laugh. Games like this and players like Foreest make a mockery of chess. We have a draw and a straightforward win. We’re showing the draw.

22nd Century (3)
Praggna-Aronian 1-0
Looking at the variations that the grandmasters did not play – and here we are, of course, referring to those who lost their games – we keep telling ourselves: ‘If only he’d played like that…’ he would be world champion. Looking at our variation of this game here, with Black winning (mate in 36 moves), many of you will get the impression that the Goldchess style of play is extraordinary chess, perhaps even 22nd-century chess, which… you can play today. We invite anyone who would like to learn to play this way to join our training programme.

1. Tournaments against our educational computer, available to download from the website (https://goldchess.com).
2. Goldchess Chess Academy. The power of Polish know-how: https://learnchess.pl.
*Anyone who organises a group of 9 students will receive a free course or a $300 bonus as the tenth member.
We are also looking for coaches to cooperate with us and run our course.

The games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

Andy Woodward won, remaining undefeated; Abhimanyu Mishra came second, with one loss. Andy, aged 16, with a rating of 2640, finished 79th in the table. Mishra, aged 17, a chess prodigy who became a Grandmaster at the youngest age – at 12 – currently has a rating of 2630 and finished 97th in the table. Future world champions are on the rise.
Third is Tanitoluwa Adewumi, aged 16, with a rating of 2467, also with one loss. We’ll take a look at both losses. Mishra made a ‘youthful mistake’. With a secure draw in hand, he decided to continue playing a knight and a pawn down and, naturally, lost. In the Adewumi–Lee game, Lee, playing Black, played beautifully in the endgame, like a grandmaster.
However, there were still chances to salvage the game. An assessment of the position after 49 moves. The a5 pawn is valuable, but not 50.a6 (?). The correct move was 56 b4. And however Black plays, it’s a draw. White cannot lose here, whereas Black can if they play inaccurately. We present one such winning line. A fine endgame.

USA Girls’ Championship Tournament 2026
Out of the 10 participants in the US Junior Girls’ Championship, only one has a distinctly American-sounding surname. And this is a rare occurrence. Only the winner, Zoel Tang, remained undefeated, whilst the second and third-placed players each suffered three defeats. We’d like to highlight the fourth-placed player, Su, and the fifth, Paragua, who each suffered just one defeat. Winning those games would have secured second place for either of them.
Wu–Paragua 1–0
The mistake was 20…Ng4, sacrificing two minor pieces for a rook. Consequently, White’s gain of a quality ended the game, as they were left with an extra piece. It was difficult to do much in this game, but we have a draw.

2026 USA Girls’ Championship Tournament
Do you know what makes chess so great and effective? It’s the fact that our opponents don’t understand what we’re playing, and so they can’t mount an effective defence. That’s the essence of the Goldchess style. And there was a pleasant surprise in this tournament. Rachael Li played exactly this sort of chess in her game against Su. From move 20, or even earlier, the game was lost for Black. But, playing as Su, we returned the favour in kind. The computer simply cannot figure out what we’re playing. We have a draw, a win involving the sacrifice of a queen (which wasn’t accepted), and a checkmate involving the capture and sacrifice of a queen. Both games are polished diamonds. They’ll feature in one of our tournaments; here we’re showing the draw.

And, as always, we invite you to play and learn with us. Our tournaments against the educational computer: (https://goldchess.com), and the Goldchess Chess Academy (https://learnchess.pl), with courses for all levels.

The games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

We will only show selected games from this tournament once we have used them in our own tournaments (Immortal-Top), where everyone will have the chance to try and win them in the specified way themselves.
These analyses form part of our Goldchess educational system. They are samples and demonstrations of what you can learn with us. We invite everyone who enjoys our modern and pioneering style of chess to take advantage of our extensive educational programme.

Tournaments. Game by the masters, new, unknown playing techniques, from a given position vs our computer.
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/tournaments.html

Goldchess Chess Academy. Courses for all levels.
https://learnchess.pl

E-book “500 Goldchess Games”. Before you buy, watch the trailer.
https://500.goldchess.com/en/product/500-goldchess-games/

=================================================

Game 10
Xue – Y Wang 1-0
Third in the table. It seems that in this game, Y Wang doesn’t really understand chess. He didn’t make the right decision on move 31. The rook exchange was necessary. And it secured victory for Black.

Game 9
Lazavik – Tin 0-1
Lazavik is second with one loss. A win in this game would have secured him victory in the tournament.
So it was worth its weight in gold. Was there a chance? Here’s our answer. We have two draws and a win. However, we had to work hard to secure the win. Would Lazavik have coped with our line of play? Probably yes. So he could have won this tournament. Generally speaking, in our view, the players’ mistakes and inaccuracies mean that this isn’t proper chess, but rather a shoving match, or a chess-like game. The game (in which you must find the win from the given position) will be in our Top or Immortal tournament.
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/tournaments.html

Game 8
Rapport–Liren 1–0
Probably the longest game we’ve seen. Liren only resigned on move 177. But it was a pointless game, and the world champion’s play was equally pointless. After move 82, the position was clear even to an amateur. There were two bishops of different colours on the board, and each side had a rook and two pawns. All that was needed was to exchange the rooks and it would have been a clear draw. In fact, a moment’s inattention by White and Black would have won the game. Yet in this game, they lost. Liren’s 82…Rf4 cost him the game. He should have played 82… Rh6, or defended the c5 pawn with both the rook and the bishop earlier. We have a series of draws, with and without the exchange of rooks, as well as a loss for White. Suffice it to say that a game in which a draw was so obvious should not have happened to a former world champion.

Game 7
Humpy Koneru-Zhang Xiao 0-1
A esta partida que ganamos con las blancas le dimos 5 estrellas. Es la máxima calificación que podemos otorgar. La colocamos al mismo nivel que las mejores partidas de Tal y Alekhine. ¿Hay actualmente algún ajedrecista en el mundo que pudiera jugar así? Nos parece poco probable. Pero podrá hacerlo siguiendo nuestro curso. Por eso invitamos a los ajedrecistas que se encuentran entre los 100 mejores a un curso especializado de ajedrez en línea, tras el cual su nivel de juego real podría aumentar de manera efectiva hasta los 3000 Elo. Para los campeones mundiales, tanto actuales como anteriores, el curso es gratuito.
Inscripciones por correo electrónico a contact@learnchess.pl

Game 6
Pang–Shirov 1–0
Chess is sometimes like a puzzle. Shirov had a straightforward plan: to exchange the major pieces and end up with bishops of opposite colours, which would have secured a draw. It could have been done in the way we show here, or in some other way. Shirov didn’t do it and lost. See how we achieve a drawn position.

Game 5
Aronian–Dartha 0–1
This was quite an amusing situation. Dartha didn’t really do anything special. Aronian walked straight into a trap and lost his queen. Black had a strong attack, and turning this game into a win for White is a true feat of chess mastery. And believe me, very few chess players in the world could manage to win this game the way we did. But anyone here can learn how to do it.

Game 4
Bilguun–Praggna 1–0
Black’s problems began on move 30. Praggna then played a suicidal line. He switched to a resolute, difficult defence, and that was the moment for an effective counter-attack. The situation called for a quality sacrifice, and that’s what we did. Thanks to that, we secured a win and a draw on move 43.

Game 3
Praggna-Erigaisi 1-0
Here, too, we had to go back to move 30, where we made the key move of the game.
This was followed by a draw offer via a queen’s check, with the king moving from f8 to f7-f8-f7, which White declined. A momentary lapse of concentration followed, and it cost them the game.

Game 2
Praggnanandhaa–Firouzja 1–0
A clash of titans, with Praggna coming out on top. Firouzja, despite a seemingly strong attack, built up a losing position. The only salvation here is an exchange of pieces and capitalising on Black’s pawn advantage on the queen’s wing. However, we had to go back as far as move 30. And not 30… Rd7, as Firouzja played, but 30…Ne5. A different plan, and we have a series of winning lines confirming the correctness of choosing this path to victory.

Game 1
Svidler-Caruana 1-0
We managed to secure a draw, which, had White been playing to win, would have
turned into a loss for them after capturing the a2 bishop. With the move 30.c3, White initiated a series of uninspired moves, the weakest of which turned out to be the last one, 35.g3. And at that point, a counterattack was called for. The move should have been 35… Na3. Caruana, however, played the incorrect 35… Bd2 and lost. It’s a shame, because had Caruana played our variation,
Svidler would have had no choice but to accept a draw or face defeat. See our win and draw.

A full report can be found in the posts on our Facebook page.
Selected games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/pl/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

———————————————— —————————
Our analyses represent a breakthrough in chess. They set a new direction in the development of chess, the way the game is played, and chess creativity. They teach modern chess. Our visions and methods of attack are new and different from those employed by contemporary chess players. That is why we are taking the initiative and offering a powerful dose of our knowledge.
For advanced players, we have the book ‘500 Goldchess Games’. Watch the trailer. Once you’ve watched it, you’ll realise that this is an extraordinary book, unlike anything else in the entire chess literature.
https://500.goldchess.com/en/product/500-goldchess-games/

We also invite you to learn at our Chess Academy, which offers courses for all levels. In the basic course, we’ll teach you more in 10 hours than other coaches do in a year.
https://learnchess.pl/login

The third element of our education programme is our tournaments, where everyone can test their own level of chess proficiency in practical play, learn new techniques and significantly improve their game. You don’t need to be a grandmaster to take part; you just need to play according to the principles of chess. If you don’t know how to play, you’ll learn quickly with us.
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/tournaments.html

===============================================================

UzChess Cup Masters Tournament
Special feature.

We return to Round 4, to the Nepomniachtchi–Abdusattorov game, which ended in a draw (on move 81).
This game was featured as the ‘Game of the Day’. We simply cannot understand why, as Nepo did not show anything special in this game; if anything, he made a mistake with 57.g6, after which, instead of winning, he drew. After our 57.Nd7, regardless of whether Black takes the knight or not, they lose. But that’s not all. We’ve reviewed the entire game from the start and found a draw as early as move 50, so why play on until move 81? Furthermore, there’s a checkmate on move 43 and a brilliant win on move 45. In other words, things that Nepo failed to spot and didn’t play. It’s difficult to comment on this, because we can’t exactly write that a former challenger doesn’t know how to play chess. But let’s put it this way: Nepo plays like Stockfisch, who, although he boasts a 3500 Elo rating, didn’t win a single game out of 100 against Alpha 0. We won’t show the 43rd-move checkmate or the 45th-move win here; they’ll feature in our Top or Immortal tournaments. Anyone who wins them will feel immense satisfaction, and will receive 3,000 Elo from our ranking. Because to win these games, you need to play at that level. However, with a little imagination, virtually any chess player can win them and earn 3,000 Elo. By the way, this is exactly what the Goldchess style is all about, and this is how we teach people to play.

Round 9
The tournament is over. Madaminov, the lowest-ranked player in this group, has won. Abdusattorov, the highest-ranked player, finished sixth.
And finally, the sensation of this round. Madaminov’s victory depended on the Niemann-Madaminov game. It ended in a draw, but had Niemann won, Madaminov would not have won the tournament. So we took a closer look at that game. Black were losing and lost in our analysis. Madaminov made a weak move, 74… c4, and the draw only occurred because Niemann also played a weak move, 75. Rh1. We have a winning position on move 90; the computer suggested the move 74… Kg6, but even after that move, Black loses even faster, on move 84. See both winning games. In our opinion, the whole group needs further training at Goldchess.

Round 8
Abdusattorov, who had a clean slate, suffered a defeat, and that against Theodorou, who is currently in last place. Probably tournament fatigue. Nodirbek sacrificed his rook and resigned. After the rook was taken, we comfortably secured a draw.

Round 7
Nothing interesting in Round 7. No changes at the top; Gujrathi won his first game, the rest were draws.

Round 6 
Nepo-Erigaisi 1-0 We secured a win for Black and a beautiful draw involving the sacrifice of the queen. Goldchess is modern chess, with different strategies. For those wishing to learn more, we recommend a solid dose of our expertise: our latest book, ‘500 Goldchess Games’, on the back cover of which we wrote: ‘without knowledge of Goldchess, one cannot be a good chess player today’. And that is a fact.

Round 5
The two lowest-ranked players in this group, in 1st and 2nd place. Well done! Vokhidov beat Nepo and consolidated his lead, whilst Madaminov, playing black against Mamedyarov, moved up from 6th to 2nd place. We won’t analyse their games; we’ll just look at the draw between the titans (the Abdusattorov-Erigaisi game), the highest-ranked players in this group. We won with White, but… It turns out that our computer, like any chess player, also makes mistakes or imprecise moves that allow us to win. And that is the case in this game. The a4 pawn should not have been captured; instead, the king should have been moved to defend at that moment. In the second variation, Black captures the rook on f5 and loses as a result. Take a look at both games.

4. Goldchess – the future is here
In the fourth round, there were more shake-ups. Madaminov suffered his second defeat and dropped to 6th place. The leader also changed; following his win, Vokhidov took the top spot, whilst Nodirbek slipped to second place. Apart from that, nothing of note. So let’s now look at the defeat of former challenger Nepomniachtchi in the first round against Madaminov. We can see the winning move. We don’t know whether Nepo overlooked it or simply couldn’t be bothered to calculate the variations after it? Exactly. At Goldchess, we don’t calculate variations. And that’s what we teach. Calculation is a chess relic from the last century. An unnecessary burden and excessive strain on the brain. In our assessment, we use imagination and intuition, which allow us to take a visionary view. Thanks to this, we spotted the move that Nepo didn’t make. We made it and won in 50 moves. The move to play was 25…Q:c3. Take a look at the game.

Round 3
Madaminov, who had led for two rounds and had the lowest rating in this group,
lost to Vokhidov and ceded the lead toAbdusattorov (the highest-rated player in this group, 2777).
After 50 moves, Black, down a pawn, is losing. But before that, it’s a matter of move selection, and it’s either a draw or a win. In the winning variation, there is also a draw on move 53, quite interesting and very instructive. We’ll show it here.

2. Nepo-Vidit Gujrathi 1-0
2 rounds, 2 defeats. We took an interest in two losses by Vidit, who was the patron of our website in 2016. At the time, he was a rising star of Indian chess. In the game against Nepomniachtchi, the problem arose when Black lost their queen on move 31. And Vidit couldn’t cope. We, however, did, and we have a draw as early as move 45 and a win on move 50. This was possible because Nepo played poorly, making 32. N:e6 (he should have played 32. K:f1). After that, Black’s win was within reach; all that was needed was to play precisely. And Vidit played well, but only for three moves. The fourth move was a home run and that was that. We’re showing real chess in this game.

Round 1
Mamedyarov-Vidit Gujrathi 1-0
This could have ended in a draw. Here, too, we capitalised on Mamedyarov’s inaccuracy, 40.Rb4, which gave us a tempo advantage. We have a draw on move 55 and stalemate on move 60. This is how you can learn to play with us. We teach modern chess. Our vision and methods of attacking differ from those used by contemporary chess players.

The games are available here: https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

In our analyses, we’ve highlighted the games played by grandmasters and world champions in this tournament, both their wins and their losses. It’s a powerful educational resource. A showcase of new ways of playing, styles and techniques – in other words, exactly what you can learn from us. Even grandmasters who have lost their games can benefit. Our analyses are valuable to them. Thanks to us, everyone has the chance to raise their level and join the best.
Join us

Tournaments. Game by the masters, new, unknown playing techniques, from a given position vs our computer.
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/tournaments.html

Goldchess Chess Academy. Courses for all levels. In our 10-hour introductory course, we’ll teach you more than other trainers do in a whole year.
https://learnchess.pl

E-book “500 Goldchess Games”. Before you buy, watch the trailer.https://500.goldchess.com/en/product/500-goldchess-games/

==============================================================

Round 9
Gukesh-Praggna 0-1
The tournament is over. So has maintained his lead and he is the winner of this tournament. Just two wins, which isn’t exactly a masterpiece, but he remained undefeated and won.
We highlight the game, Gukesh’s fourth loss. Both he and Carlsen have four losses each and occupy the bottom two places. An unimaginable and hard-to-fathom disaster. If they both knew Goldchess, this probably wouldn’t have happened. Our style is a breath of fresh air in the new generation of chess. A great way for anyone to expand their knowledge. Gukesh’s loss. The endgame: the world champion down a pawn and a piece. However, it was possible to escape from such a predicament. A win is difficult, but we achieve one on move 80. Perhaps Praggna would have secured a draw in this variation, but certainly nothing more.
Take a look at our winning move. Anyone who thinks the computer played poorly should try to beat it with a different, original concept of their own from our position. And this applies to all the games in our analyses.

Round 8
Carlsen’s slip-up
In Round 8, world champion Gukesh suffered his third defeat. And Carlsen his fourth. For us, this is an unimaginable and unacceptable situation. All the more so because we analysed both games and concluded that neither of them was a lost cause.
Carlsen-Praggna 0-1
Here, Carlsen only has himself to blame. Mr World Champion, who plays 44.Qd6 when the simple 44.Qf4 wins? Do you want to learn to play like this? Take advantage of our education.

Round 8 bis
Firouzja–Gukesh 1–0
Simple moves. A straightforward path to a draw. We have two draws. One is a solid, trouble-free draw, and the other is slightly risky, made possible because the computer played inaccurately: 55.gh4. After 55.Kg2, Black loses. But given that our grandmasters also make inaccuracies and mistakes, this variation would probably have been enough for Gukesh to secure a draw.

Round 7
Praggna-Firousia 1-0
Pragna, who has three losses to his name, can always be a threat. That defeat completely dashed Firousia’s hopes. After that, he dropped to third place. Only the leader, So, and Keymer, who is in second place, remain undefeated. Will they maintain their unbeaten records until the end?
Firousia is the big loser of this tournament. That is why we have examined this game. And based on our analysis, we can say that Firousia could have won this game; indeed, he had no business losing it. We have a draw in which White is desperately fighting for a draw, as well as a win and a checkmate. Both these lines show real chess, the kind that should have unfolded in this game. It didn’t happen because Firousia lacked the right vision… A very instructive game.

Round 6
Round 6 proved unkind to Firousia, who lost his lead after losing to Carlsen, to Gukesh, who lost to Keymer, and to Praggna, who lost to So, the current leader. We always side with the underdogs, or rather the losers, pointing out their mistakes and winning continuations. And so. In the Keymer-Gukesh game, we have a draw, and a win for Black when White refuses the draw and wants to play for a win. We also have a clear win. This is a ‘who’s who’ type of win, because the one who plays better wins. And we think Gukesh could well have been the one who played better. In the more favourable variation for White, a draw is the result here.
Carlsen-Firousia 1-0 is a rematch for Carlsen’s previous loss, so we won’t be looking for a win for Black here. We’re showing a win for Black in Gukesh’s game.

Round 5
Another draw for Firouzja, a win for Gukesh and drama for Carlsen, who lost his third game, this time to So. Carlsen allowed himself to get into a very difficult position. The position after move 42. The pawns on a4 and c4 are weak. White’s move 44.Nd2 is also weak. After the response 44… Ne5, the white king is blocked and has no move. So we change this move and it works. We have a winning position and two draw variations. It’s a matter of assessing the position and choosing a plan of play. This is how Carlsen could have played, with at least a chance of a draw. Take a look.

Round 4
So-Firousia draw
We tried to turn that draw into a win. And we succeeded – we’ve got two wins and a checkmate. One of them was particularly spectacular. Technical note. You must play with precision. Do not rush; do not sacrifice your queen by capturing the f2 rook before capturing the b2 pawn, as Black will then lose. White will play b2-b4, and the game is lost. If you like our style of play, we invite you to join our course so that you can learn to play in exactly this way.

Round 4
Another draw for Firousia. He now leads by just one point and is hanging by a thread. One defeat and he could lose his lead. In the clash of the titans, Carlsen triumphed playing Black. And something incredible has happened. World Champion Gukesh has taken Carlsen’s place and is bottom of the table. The prestige of world champions is fading. The endgame shows a total rout. Gukesh has lost his queen and Black is helpless. Why did he lose? He played 35.Q:f4. We are astonished by this move from the world champion. In this position, the moves Rb2+ and Qf2 were obvious and clear even to an amateur. Admittedly, the situation was precarious and dangerous for White, but a draw could have been achieved. And that is the draw we have and are showing. A very instructive lesson for Gukesh. We also have a winning position, but to win, a different move and a different plan of play would have had to be played much earlier.

Round 3
Firousia drew with Gukesh. For a change, we’ll show how he could have won this game.
Firouzja seems to have misjudged his chances. We played exactly from this drawn position and achieved mate on move 45. Take a look. To learn more about chess like this, visit Goldchess.

In the women’s tournament, the competition is fiercer and the standard more even. After three rounds, there has been just one win and one loss, with the rest being draws.

Round 3
Pragg-Carlsen 1-0
A drama for Carlsen. His second defeat in three rounds. This has probably never happened to a world champion anywhere. And a situation also rarely seen in the games of the best chess players: White has a two-quality advantage. The promising 43… Ne2, attacking the rook, lost. We played 43… N:a2 and obtained two responses from White. We win in both variations. Take a look. Goldchess style and techniques.

Round 2
Firousia-Praggna/Nandhaa 1-0
Firousia’s next victim: Praggna. After two rounds, Firousia leads the field.
Analysis. There is a threat of mate on a4. 59…c4 is a move of desperation that can no longer change anything.
Firousia played really strongly and, above all, better than Praggna. With the move 38…c5, he initiated a series of three blunders. And after 40…. b:c5, the game was already lost. And that was the moment when he could have made a different move and drawn or even won. Here we have a winning position at level 5, where the computer played carelessly and lost, and we have a draw at level 23, where the computer, playing White, is already playing much better. And that is the whole analytical philosophy of this game as we see it.

Round 1
Firousia-Carlsen 1-0
We’ve turned the result around. And that’s something to see. We’d particularly like to invite Carlsen.

The European Championship Tournament has ended.
Roman Dehtiarov was crowned the winner; his only defeat came in the game against Emre Can (2546).
The final position is dramatic. Playing with the white pieces, Can has a five-pawn advantage. Even from earlier positions, this game was unwinnable for Dehtiarov.

Earlier
After nine rounds, the Polish players are playing second fiddle. Only Gumularz and Klimkowski feature in the main table, with just one defeat each. We’ll take a closer look at some of the Poles’ lost games, because alongside the unknown names are well-known players such as Piorun, Nasuta and Śliwicka. We’ve picked a few games at random and will show Polish chess players how to play chess properly. So as not to lose, of course. We won’t show them all, though; the most valuable ones will be in the Immortal tournament.

Klimkowski-Daniel Dartha 0-1
The most important Polish game. If our 19-year-old grandmaster had won it, he would have had the same number of points as the leader in the standings, and who knows… perhaps he would be the European champion today. As for the game itself, we have a winning position. The most important thing to do was to exchange queens. We did this by playing differently on move 31, 31.b3. Had Janek done so, he would have been Dartha’s worst nightmare. After the exchange of queens, no matter how Black plays, they lose. We show four variations. They might appeal to you. So our champion had a chance to win it. It’s a shame he didn’t rise to the occasion. Here is one of our games.

Damian Śliwicki-Tashkinova 0-1
Damian lost to some cinema star, which we simply cannot understand, because cinema isn’t really that big a thing these days. As for the game itself. Whenever you play badly, you lose. And Damian, playing with the white pieces, had a wonderful opportunity to shine. He didn’t take it. He played 31. g:h3, when the simple a4 would have won. We show this in our variation.

Alicja Śliwicka-Martirosyan 0-1
The final position is a disaster. Let’s rewind. After 35 moves, White is down three pawns; by move 30, they had no game left. There’s simply no good continuation to be seen. Incredible. Yet there were counter-chances. And a creative chess player, even when there are no counter-chances, can create them. Alicja lacked creativity. In our game, our sparring partner, the CEEC computer, having two extra pawns, went for a rook exchange and lost. And in this position, Black also lost after 37…c5. And we’re showing this variation too.

Piorun’s slip-ups
As misfortunes come in pairs, Kacper lost two games. Against Aron Pasti and Kalogeris. Over a hundred points’ lead in the rankings over both opponents and, unfortunately, defeats. We’re already looking into why. The game against Kalogeris. We won’t comment on the opening moves; Piorun played his game, and here is the position after White’s 29th move. Move 29.Re4 was already weak as it voluntarily sacrifices a piece. Better for White would have been 29.Re2. But okay, here’s the position. What does it tell us? It’s simple. White’s queen is playing without any support from her pieces. In a professional game, there are no instances where an unsupported queen achieves anything. And in this position, Piorun plays 29…g3. A disaster.
Black has an army directed at the white king, and yet he makes this move. There were a number of better moves; we found and played four of them, and in every case Black wins by checkmate. Take a look at one of them.

The second game against Pasti. Here, Pasti displayed precise and brilliant chess, so we won’t spoil the effect. We’ve included the original game. An incredible endgame. Pasti clearly outclasses Piorun here. Every move he makes is better than Piorun’s.

Modzelewski-Tescan 0-1
In our view, to win this game, it was necessary to sacrifice a rook in order to develop strong pawns in the centre. And that is what we did. We then played three different variations from move 37, and won in each of them. We present all three.

Sargsyan-Kacharova 1-0
We have also highlighted a young chess player from Georgia, Nikolozi Kacharova, aged 22, rated 2500, who, with six wins, suffered a single defeat playing Black against Sargsyan. For had he won that game, he would have taken first place and claimed the title of European Champion. White plays sensibly and precisely. 26.d4. After 26.Q:a5, Black wins, and we show that winning line. To win after 26.d4, one must look for another way to victory. And we found it too. Had Kacharov found it, he would have been the 2026 European Champion.

7. Grzegorz Nasuta was eliminated from the championship; although he did not lose a single game, he had too many draws, resulting in a lower points tally and failing to make the top ranks. And surely he could have won at least some of those drawn games and improved his result.
But it could have gone differently. As proof, we’ll look at a drawn game against Hayk Yeritsyan, who was one of Goldchess’s top players a fair few years ago and now has a rating of 2342. And in this game, it was Hayk who could have won. We’re showing this variation because it’s extraordinary.
All the games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

2026 World Championship Candidates

To begin with, a question – and by no means a rhetorical one.
Do they – the top chess players, the participants in this tournament – actually know how to play chess?  The answer to this lies in the analyses on our blog.

Our coverage of this tournament goes beyond contemporary chess theory and practice. In it, we highlight the weaknesses and shortcomings in the players’ games, including the winner’s. And we present our own new ideas and concepts.
We bring knowledge to chess that even the grandmasters lack.

That is why they can come to us to further their education. We invite them, and not just them. We also invite other chess players who wish to discover the secrets of the Goldchess style and learn to play chess well and brilliantly.

Goldchess Online Chess Academy – courses for all levels.

https://learnchess.pl

Each set of analyses includes our games, the original for comparison, and positions should anyone wish to find the winning move themselves. Of course, we then play against our educational computer, which can be downloaded from goldchess.com

The games are here:
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

1. Probably the biggest highlight of our analysis and of this tournament.

Nakamura-Sindarov 0-1

We didn’t want to look for a win for Nakamura here, as he lost decisively. However, knowing that every game has a logical flaw—a pivotal moment where the outcome hinges on a single move—we did look. And we can say with complete certainty and confidence that Nakamura should come to Goldchess to learn how to play chess. Because what he overlooked, in our eyes, disqualifies him. I might even venture to say that no grandmaster in the Candidates Tournament has ever lost like this before. Of course, if Nakamura had played like this…
In set 3, our checkmates and the original for comparison. Night and day. See for yourselves.

2. Caruana–Nakamura 1–0

A hard-fought win in 83 moves. Caruana undoubtedly plays strongly and has his own style, though in our view there is too much positional play in it. Caruana could do with a bit of a shake-up, perhaps something like the variation we’ve shown, which wins in 52 moves. A different atmosphere, 31 moves faster – that’s something. But that’s not all. In this game, we have a win involving a double queen sacrifice. A chess gem.

But these are uncharted territory for Caruana, and we suspect he wouldn’t be able to play it. And he’s not the only one. We believe, and we’re probably right, that playing this variation is beyond the technical capabilities of most grandmasters. But the young, that is, the younger chess players, will find it. This game will be featured in the Immortal tournament (every Saturday).

3. Sindarov-Caruana 1-0
   Caruana lost to Sindarov. Precisely because he lacks that certain something we mentioned when discussing the Caruana-Nakamura draw. Greater versatility. The ability to make a brilliant move. Sindarov, with the move 36.Rc5 – which Caruana did not foresee and which took him completely by surprise – forced him to resign. We won’t be looking for a win for Black here, but will instead show other variations White could have played. A draw on move 46; then, with a bit of cunning and wit, Black loses their queen and must resign on move 49. In the third variation, we have a win on move 41. After this game, we can say that Caruana should definitely train further at Goldchess, even if he comes to us anonymously. You’re welcome to join us.

4. Top-of-the-table clashes

Praggna-Sindarov 0-1

Sindarov is in top form and mowing everyone down. Praggna lost in 40 moves. In the endgame, it was a rout for White. Six pawns to two. Incredible and a rare occurrence. But at Goldchess, we can turn that around. Here, it’s a rout of Black in 34 moves. Why did Praggna lose? I’ll tell you. He lost because, in the position after 18 moves, he played 19.Qc3. So, is Sindarov, the frontrunner, really playing that strongly?

We’ll answer that after reviewing all his games in this tournament. In this game, our win in 34 moves, we show that he isn’t playing strongly and that he can be outplayed. You just have to play, Grandmaster Praggnandhaa.

5. Praggna-Giri 1-0

Giri lost. But did he really? How illusory it all is. This loss stems solely from an inability to play endgames. And it is not credible in real, proper chess. With Black, we have a draw on move 60, and Giri could also have achieved it without any trouble.

6. Caruana–Bluebaum 1–0

Caruana won. But in complicated positions, anything can happen.
And in our game, Black won, and in fine style. All it took was gaining a single tempo.

Bluebaum failed to spot this. So if practically all the wins can be called into question, was the Candidates Tournament a serious affair? It seems not. That is to say, in FIDE terms, yes; in chess terms, no. Like two sides of the same coin. And those who won must be aware of this. That it could have gone the other way.

Caruana delivered a beautiful checkmate with a pawn on move 28; we turned the result around on move 29. A move later, but ours is spectacular too. We also show a checkmate on move 32, when White plays a different 24th move.

7. We’re showing you how to play chess.
   Sindarov’s two draws are a thorn in our side, as they’re spoiling his record.

Sindarov-Bluebaum. Sindarov was unable to win this game. We could. The simplicity and elegance of chess. Our victory is based on the following plan of play:

1.Both rooks must be exchanged. Sindarov’s 29.B:e1 was a mistake. The rook should have been captured with a rook. After the rook exchange, White is left with two bishops, Black with a black-squared bishop and a knight. To have any chance of playing at all, Black must activate and advance the knight. We will then exchange it, simultaneously demolishing Black’s pawn structure. That is our plan. Logical, simple and effective. Sindarov didn’t play it. And we fully executed our plan. White wins on move 41. See how we did it. Magic.

8. Sindarov–Giri: a draw
   We show you how to play chess

Another good title for this game. Our concepts are foolproof and far superior to those employed by today’s chess players. This is clearly evident in this tournament. Our analysts are ahead of the game. In this game, we can clearly see the weakness of the bishop on d7, which is standing on the king’s file. And this is the theme we exploit to win. In two ways and in a beautiful style that can amaze literally anyone. And a small note. We do not take the d5 pawn like Sindarov (41.R:d5), because then Black mobilises his pieces to defend it, allowing us to calmly carry out our plan.

9. Esipenko–Sindarov: Draw
Another draw, this time against the bottom-placed team. An outsider taking half a point off the leader feels like half a defeat. But Esipenko played this game very strongly and, to be honest, Sindarov was rather lucky to secure the draw. It could have been worse. We found a mate on move 47 in our analysis, but only after a great deal of struggle and trial and error. It was like looking for a needle in a haystack. That is why we believe that neither Sindarov nor any other chess player in the world will find this variation during the tournament. Or perhaps no one will find it at all. We’ll find out in the Immortal tournament. In addition to the prize, the winner will receive the title of Immortal Genius.
A final note. To win a game, you must surprise your opponent with something. And this game is a prime example of the truth of that statement. That surprise is Black’s forced capture of the queen.

10. Bluebaum-Sindarov draw
Sindarov’s fourth draw. Probably fatigue, and his playing strength has waned. He still has an advantage over the runner-up, but he must conserve his strength for the finish so as not to lose that advantage. The drawn position has essentially persisted since the start of the game, and so they proceed to the endgame. Equal pawns, equal pieces. Breaking this balance is extremely difficult. But not impossible. We broke this drawish zugzwang and have wins on move 52. That’s what Sindarov lacked in this game. The key to victory lies in Black’s 31st move.

11. Sindarov–Praggna 1–0
It looks as though Sindarov will see this victory through to the end. In the 10th round, he beat Praggna and extended his lead over Giri to 2 points. We’re keeping our fingers crossed.
P.S. We’re not looking for a win for Praggna here. At Goldchess, we teach you to play beautifully and brilliantly. So we’re showing how Sindarov could have ended this game differently (he played 52.Qd8). Take a look at our variation.

12. Sindarov-Wei Yi draw
Sindarov secured the victory. He performed less well in the second round, with 1 win and 6 draws. Esipenko proved to be the weakest link in the table. But in an 8-player tournament like this, someone always has to be the points provider. As a rule, it’s the bottom four. Here, Nakamura and Praggna joined the ranks of the points providers. Our heroes are Giri, who lost only one game, and of course the winner, who didn’t lose a single one.
As the final game in our analytical report, we present Sindarov’s (White) last draw against Wei Yi. We rose above the level of this match and it paid off. We brilliantly won a piece and the game was over.
Two questions raised in this report remain to be answered.
Was the tournament a serious affair, and do they – the world’s top chess players – know how to play chess?
And here, since silence is golden, we remain silent. Let everyone find the answer for themselves.
Of course, after watching our games and comparing them with the originals.
Games: https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/winnerslist.html#g0_wins

2026 Women’s World Championship Candidates Tournament
Rameshbabu Vaishali won the tournament. However, she lost two games to the same opponent, Jiner Zhu, allowing Zhu to finish in 3rd place. It seems that Babu struggles against her. We analyzed both losses, with White and Black. Indeed, Zhu is a tough opponent to beat; she plays a style of chess that is difficult for her opponents. However, we managed to draw with Black and win with White. Draw. All it took was to control the “c” file to prevent White’s pieces from entering Black’s territory and to exchange them.
The win is more complicated. We’re showing the draw here; the win will be featured in one of our tournaments.

To be continued.

Our other (non-course) educational resources:

The book ‘500 Goldchess Games’, in Polish and English

https://500.goldchess.com/en/product/500-goldchess-games/

Our tournaments
https://www.goldchess.com/en/other/tournaments.html

We invite you to learn.

 

I would venture to say that in today’s chess game, the aim is to defeat your opponent’s mind and score a point. In our game, Goldchess, the aim is to actually win at chess. It seems the same, but it is not.

I would also venture to say that all the games played so far are unbelievable wins, because in each of them we can show a different, better game by the opponent, the chess player who lost, and reverse the result.
Our latest book, ‘500 Goldchess Games’ and the 10-hour chess course, offer a new, fresh perspective on chess. They will surprise even the best. No one plays like this today.
For a full understanding, I can only add that the games in the current 10 million chessbase, compared to the Goldchess games, are chess from a bygone era.
This also applies to today’s chess learning programmes used  by coaches around the world. A bygone era.

We invite you to discover new ideas and a new quality of the royal game. Only with us. Our book ‘500 Goldchess Games’:

https://500.goldchess.com/en/product/500-goldchess-games/

Our online course in English, Polish and Spanish:

Log in – GoldChess Chess Academy

https://learnchess.pl/login

We invite you to join us.